Roving Wiretaps and the Anti-Terrorism Bill I have seen several articles stating that the "roving wiretap" amendment in the Anti-Terrorism bill would allow the government to wiretap all phones in a wide area. This is false. Roving wiretaps (also called "multipoint wiretaps") allow a law enforcement agency to intercept the communications of a subject with a single court order even when the subject's telephone is subject to change (e.g., because the subject is moving around in order to evade interception). The amendment (Sec. 909 in Senate bill S.7876) removes a requirement that the application for the court order show that the subject's intent is to thwart surveillance, allowing the application to show instead that the subject's actions would have the effect of thwarting surveillance. The full text of the amendment follows. Even when a roving wiretap is authorized, prior to intercepting communications, the investigative officer must use some other method of investigation in order to determine the exact location and/or telephone number of the facility being used. The officer may not intercept communications randomly in order to track a person. In 1992, there were 4 roving wiretap orders; in 1993, 7. Sec. 909. REVISION TO EXISTING AUTHORITY FOR MULTIPOINT WIRETAPS. (a) Section 2518(11)(b)(ii) of title 18 is amended: by deleting "of a purpose, on the part of that person, to thwart interception by changing facilities." and inserting "that the person had the intent to thwart interception or that the person's actions and conduct would have the effect of thwarting interception from a specialized facility.". (b) Section 2518(11)(b)(iii) is amended to read: "(iii) the judge finds that such showing has been adequately made.". [The current wording is: "(iii) the judge finds that such purpose has been adequately shown." DED] For more information about wiretaps, see "Wiretap Laws and Procedures," which is available through The Cryptography Project web page: http://www.cosc.georgetown.edu/~denning/crypto/ Dorothy E. Denning